Who's Online

We have 334 guests online

Popular

2077 readings
A Brief Window for Peace in Palestine PDF Print E-mail
Peace News
Tuesday, 28 November 2006 12:16
A Brief Window for Peace in Palestine

AG
- Rami G. Khouri - It would be easy for both sides to write off the offers that Olmert and Meshaal made as propaganda exercises. It would also be a great shame, because beneath their conditional and tentative public offers to live in peace are some crucial political realities that must be seized and built upon, before they evaporate: Israelis and Palestinians are nearing exhaustion in their existential battle for the land of Palestine/Israel, and both recognize that their prevailing military strategies will not achieve their long-term goals.

www.agenceglobal.com

With Israeli and Palestinian leadership making moves and intimations of negotiable agreements, George W. Bush -- on his way to the region -- should make the most of a moment when peace-making is quite possible. And so should the Quartet and the Arab League.


This Historic Moment for Peace-making

Rami G. Khouri

Agence Global
November 28, 2006 

Copyright ?2006 Rami G. Khouri / Agence Global
[Republished at PEJ News with AG permission]

BEIRUT -- When the leaders of Israel and Hamas in the same weekend offer each other long-term peace deals, you just know in your bones that we are passing through a potentially historic moment. Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert said November 26, that Israel was prepared to leave much of the occupied territories, release many Palestinian prisoners, remove many roadblocks and checkpoints, and restore the delivery of withheld tax funds that belong to the Palestinians. Hamas leader Khaled Meshaal for his part said in Cairo, the day before, that the Palestinians expect to see serious progress towards a Palestinian state in all the territories occupied in 1967 -- which Hamas approves -- or else a third intifada would erupt.

It would be easy for both sides to write off the offers that Olmert and Meshaal made as propaganda exercises. It would also be a great shame, because beneath their conditional and tentative public offers to live in peace are some crucial political realities that must be seized and built upon, before they evaporate: Israelis and Palestinians are nearing exhaustion in their existential battle for the land of Palestine/Israel, and both recognize that their prevailing military strategies will not achieve their long-term goals. They understand that the rest of the world is perfectly happy to watch them kill each other for years to come, so consequently they both seem prepared to explore means of achieving their basic national goals through peaceful negotiations.

These men are not spelling out comprehensive, detailed peace plans. They demand of the other side much more than they are prepared to give. Neither will unilaterally offer the concessions demanded of them. Yet, we should recognize what they are doing this week: They are sending important signals of a conditional willingness to coexist, which they manifested in a more limited manner with their agreement to implement a cease-fire in Gaza last weekend. The Palestinians agreed to stop firing rockets into southern Israel, and Israel agreed to pull its troops out of Gaza and halt attacks against the Palestinians there.

This is a significant opening that U.S. President George W. Bush should pounce on when he visits the Middle East this week, so that the Palestinian-Israeli diplomatic flirting could be expanded into a serious negotiation. Such a move would unlock doors leading to calming or resolving other conflicts in the region, including Iraq, Lebanon, Syria and Iran.

Bush and his Quartet partners should immediately call for an open-ended meeting with an Arab League delegation headed by several Arab heads of state to work on a single agenda item: How can we reconcile the 2002 Arab Summit Peace Plan that offers Arab coexistence with Israel and a Palestinian state with this week?s Olmert and Meshaal offers and Bush?s own vision of peace based on Israeli and Palestinian states living peacefully alongside each other? They should all come to the gathering on the basis of just one inviolable principle: they will all stop their military activities and commit themselves to negotiations to achieve a mutually agreed peace on the basis of UN resolutions and prevailing international law. Nothing else will be demanded or conceded other than this starting point for talks.

This rare moment of Palestinians and Israelis hinting at their mutual right to live in peace and recognition coincides with Bush?s arrival in the Middle East at a decisive juncture in the region?s modern history. Political tensions and active wars plague half a dozen Arab countries, while the region suffers increased interference by non-Arab parties like Iran, the United States and the UK. Our region cannot afford to remain mired in worsening armed conflict, civil wars, and a maelstrom of mindless self-destruction. It can instead move towards a more stable and satisfying future, by rationally and systematically resolving the conflicts that afflict it.

The Palestine-Israel conflict is at the center of the region?s continuing radicalization and militarization. Resolving it peacefully -- which is possible -- remains the single most useful contribution to lowering tensions throughout the entire area.

The opening we have this week is fragile, but real. The players in the region and the principal actors abroad should not allow their cynicism, pride or narrow domestic political interests to overshadow their sense of responsibility or their basic decency and rationality at this crucial moment. If central characters such as Olmert and Meshaal are unilaterally making imprecise offers for peace and coexistence, even in vague, temporary or open-ended truces, the rest of us should jump on this new constellation of positions.

It would be irresponsible folly to leave this for the United States to handle on its own, given its proven track record as a partisan and unsuccessful mediator. If the Quartet with its roadmap and the Arab League with its peace plan have any life left in them, this is their moment to work together quickly to push Israelis and Arabs towards a structured negotiation anchored in more explicit and mutual national rights for all concerned. Moments like this do not come along very often.

Rami G. Khouri is an internationally syndicated columnist, the director of the Issam Fares Institute at the American University of Beirut, editor-at-large of the Beirut-based Daily Star, and co-laureate of the 2006 Pax Christi International Peace Award.

Copyright ?2006 Rami G. Khouri / Agence Global

----------------

Released: 28 November 2006
Word Count: 831

----------------

-------------------

Advisory Release: 28 November 2006
Rights & Permissions Contact: Agence Global, 1.336.686.9002, This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it  

------------------

For rights and permissions, contact: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it , 1.336.686.9002 or 1.212.731.0757

Agence Global
www.agenceglobal.com1.212.731.0757 (main)
1.336.286.6606 (billing)
1.336.686.9002 (rights & permissions)

Agence Global is the exclusive syndication agency for The Nation, The American Prospect, Le Monde diplomatique, as well as expert commentary by Richard Bulliet, Mark Hertsgaard, Rami G. Khouri, Tom Porteous, Patrick Seale and Immanuel Wallerstein

Last Updated on Tuesday, 28 November 2006 12:16
 

Latest News