Who's Online

We have 920 guests online


3747 readings
Canadian Military Spying Activities Require More Scrutiny: Watchdog PDF Print E-mail
Justice News
Written by Joan Russow
Thursday, 11 April 2019 06:51


A committee flagged the possibility that Canadians' rights may be infringed.


By Jim Bronskill  


The facade of the headquarters of the Department of National Defence is pictured in Ottawa, on April 3, 2013. ADRIAN WYLD/CP




The facade of the headquarters of the Department of National Defence is pictured in Ottawa, on April 3, 2013. 
OTTAWA — A national-security watchdog has called for stricter controls on the Canadian military's spying, including the possibility of legislation spelling out when and how defence intelligence operations can take place.
In a report issued Tuesday, the National Security and Intelligence Committee of Parliamentarians said National Defence and the Canadian Armed Forces have one of the largest intelligence programs in Canada, yet these operations get little outside scrutiny.
The committee, which examined thousands of pages and received several closed-door briefings, found that defence agencies carry out a full range of intelligence activities, collecting information through sensitive methods including technical means, human sources and investigations.
It says these activities entail considerable risks, including possible infringements on Canadians' rights.
Crown prerogative is main source of authority
The main source of authority for deploying the Canadian Forces and conducting defence intelligence activities is known as the Crown prerogative. It allows the government to make decisions as it sees fit unless its hands are otherwise tied by statutes or the courts.
As a result, while certain administrative directives and rules govern defence intelligence, there is no legislation that explicitly guides these activities. The committee notes this amounts to "an anomaly" in the intelligence world, given that the domestic spies at the Canadian Security Intelligence Service and the cyberspies of the Communications Security Establishment have laws spelling out what they can and cannot do.
It means the scope and authority of defence intelligence are "unknown to Canadians" and have not been subject to parliamentary scrutiny, the report says.
Also unlike CSIS and the CSE, military intelligence activities are not subject to regular review by an independent and external body, the committee adds. "Review can, among other things, strengthen accountability for an organization's compliance with the law."
Officials say legislation would undermine information sharing
The MPs and senators on the committee said the government should consider legislation to govern defence intelligence work. They also recommended the military be required to report annually on its intelligence operations.
However, National Defence and Forces officials "raised a number of concerns" with the idea of a statutory framework for intelligence, the report says.
Among them: the comparisons to Canada's major spy agencies are inappropriate because intelligence is just one of many things the military does, not its sole mission. In addition, legislation could undermine information sharing with Canada's closest allies and make the military less flexible when it comes to operations.
The committee said legislation could bring significant benefits, including greater accountability, although it would have to be "carefully crafted" to account for the military's unique mandate.
Defence Minister Harjit Sajjan said his department would look at the idea.
"There are internal processes that we have in place. Can we improve those? Of course we are looking at those," he said after a cabinet meeting Tuesday.
But he added that Canada needs to ensure "we have the flexibility to keep our soldiers safe."
At a news conference, Liberal MP David McGuinty, chairman of the committee, said the MPs and senators found "no evidence of wrongdoing" by defence personnel.
Still, the committee plans a follow-up report that will look at the military's authority and directives to collect, use, keep and distribute information and intelligence on Canadians.
COMMENT BY JOAN RUSSOW This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
My rights were infringed on when I was put on an RCMP Threat Assessment list in 1997. 
i could never find out the reason even through access to information  because of "security reasons"
i have had to live with this stigma for years.  i believe i was discriminated against for political opinion in violation of  a listed ground for which there must not be discrimination: "political and other opinion"  in the International Covenant on civil and Political Rights 








Last Updated on Thursday, 11 April 2019 07:51

Latest News