Who's Online

We have 685 guests online

Popular

International Earth Articles
Three International Days in a Week, But Is Anybody Listening? PDF Print E-mail
Earth News
Posted by Joan Russow   
Wednesday, 23 March 2016 06:57

By Monique Barbut

Monique Barbut

Monique Barbut

 

BONN, Germany, Mar 22 2016 (IPS) - For three consecutive days this week, we gave thought to our future. On International Forests Day, Monday, 21 March, we were reminded that forests are vital for our future water needs. On Tuesday, 22 March, World Water Day, we learned that half the world’s workers are involved in the water sector and some 2 billion people, especially women and girls, still need access to improved sanitation. World Meteorological Day, on Wednesday, 23 March, concluded with the warning of a hotter, drier and wetter future. A reality that is already evident and frightening, as productive land turns to sand or dust.

 

 

Is anybody listening?

Read more...
 
OP-ED: Rising Temperature, Rising Food Prices PDF Print E-mail
Earth News
Posted by Joan Russow   
Sunday, 06 March 2016 13:04

By Lester R. Brown

By Lester R. Brown|

Many farmers will be forced to adapt to a changing climate. Geoffrey Ndung’u, from Kanyonga village in semi-arid Eastern Kenya, earns a living growing watermelons on his dry land. Credit: Isaiah Esipisu/IPS

 

Many farmers will be forced to adapt to a changing climate. Geoffrey Ndung’u, from Kanyonga village in semi-arid Eastern Kenya, earns a living growing watermelons on his dry land. Credit: Isaiah Esipisu/IPS

WASHINGTON, Aug 21 2013 (IPS) - Agriculture as it exists today developed over 11,000 years of rather remarkable climate stability. It has evolved to maximize production within that climate system. Now, suddenly, the climate is changing. With each passing year, the agricultural system is becoming more out of sync with the climate system.

In generations past, when there was an extreme weather event, such as a monsoon failure in India, a severe drought in Russia, or an intense heat wave in the U.S. Corn Belt, we knew that things would shortly return to normal. But today there is no ‘normal’ to return to. The earth’s climate is now in a constant state of flux, making it both unreliable and unpredictable.

Since 1970, the earth’s average temperature has risen more than one degree Fahrenheit. If we continue with business as usual, burning ever more oil, coal, and natural gas, it is projected to rise some 11 degrees Fahrenheit (six degrees Celsius) by the end of this century. The rise will be uneven. It will be much greater in the higher latitudes than in the equatorial regions, greater over land than over oceans, and greater in continental interiors than in coastal regions.

Related IPS Articles

·         Ecological Cuban Recipes Boost Sustainable Agriculture

·         Biofuels Get a Dubious Boost

·         Small Farmers Buffeted by Climate Change

As the earth’s temperature rises, it affects agriculture in many ways. High temperatures interfere with pollination and reduce photosynthesis of basic food crops. High temperatures can also dehydrate plants. When a corn plant curls its leaves to reduce exposure to the sun, photosynthesis is reduced.

The earth’s rising temperature also affects crop yields indirectly via the melting of mountain glaciers. As the larger glaciers shrink and the smaller ones disappear, the ice melt that sustains rivers, and the irrigation systems dependent on them, will diminish. The continuing loss of mountain glaciers and the resulting reduced meltwater runoff could create unprecedented water shortages and political instability in some of the world’s more densely populated countries.

Scientists also expect higher temperatures to bring more drought – witness the dramatic increase in the land area affected by drought in recent decades. A team of scientists at the National Centre for Atmospheric Research in the United States reported that the earth’s land area experiencing very dry conditions expanded from well below 20 percent from the 1950s to the 1970s to closer to 25 percent in recent years.

As the earth’s temperature rises, scientists expect heat waves to be both more frequent and more intense. Stated otherwise, crop-shrinking heat waves will now become part of the agricultural landscape. Among other things, this means that the world should increase its carryover stocks of grain to provide adequate food security.

From “Full Planet, Empty Plates: The New Geopolitics of Food Scarcity” by Lester R. Brown (New York: W.W. Norton & Co.) Supporting data, video, and slideshows are available for free download at www.earth-policy.org/books/fpep.

 

 

Last Updated on Sunday, 06 March 2016 13:11
 
Farmers, CSOs Rally Behind Environmentalist Jailed for Exposing Land Grabbing in Cameroon PDF Print E-mail
Earth News
Posted by Joan Russow   
Monday, 15 February 2016 11:50

By Mbom Sixtus 

YOUNDE, Cameroon, Dec 15 2015 (IPS) - Farmers and activists in Cameroon say a jail sentence handed down on an environmentalist who exposed land-grabbing by a multinational agro-industrial company, sends a dangerous signal to communities trying to protect their land and resources.

Nasako Bessingi, Director of Struggle to Economize Future Environment, SEFE, was sentenced on November 3, by a court in Mundemba, a small village in Cameroon’s southwest region. The SG-SOC company, a subsidiary of the New York-based Herakles Farms and two of his former employees sued him for defamation.

Read more...
 
Jamaica’s Drought Tool Could Turn the Table on Climate Change PDF Print E-mail
Earth News
Posted by Joan Russow   
Monday, 15 February 2016 11:46

By Zadie Neufvillel

Drought-map_

KINGSTON, Jamaica, Jan 13 2016 (IPS) - On a very dry November 2013, Jamaica’s Meteorological Service made its first official drought forecast when the newly developed Climate Predictability Tool (CPT) was used to predict a high probability of below average rainfall in the coming three months.

By February, the agency had officially declared a drought in the eastern and central parishes of the island based on the forecasts. July’s predictions indicated that drought conditions would continue until at least September.

Read more...
 
Jamaica’s Climate Change Fight Fuels Investments in Renewables PDF Print E-mail
Earth News
Posted by Joan Russow   
Monday, 15 February 2016 11:42

By Zadie Neufville

Jamaica's electricity generation systrms and grid will require significant upgrades and expansion. Credit: Zadie Neufville/ IPS

Jamaica's electricity generation systrms and grid will require significant upgrades and expansion. Credit: Zadie Neufville/ IPS

KINGSTON, Jan 18 2016 (IPS) - By year’s end, Jamaica will add 115 mega watts (MW) of renewable capacity to the power grid, in its quest to reduce energy costs and diversify the energy mix in electricity generation to 30 per cent by 2030.

With 90 per cent of its electricity coming from fossil fuels, the government is committed to reducing the country’s carbon emissions by increasing the amount of electricity generated from renewables from 9 per cent now, to 15 per cent by 2020.

Last Updated on Monday, 15 February 2016 11:44
Read more...
 
Nevis Has A Date With Geothermal Energy PDF Print E-mail
Earth News
Posted by Joan Russow   
Monday, 15 February 2016 11:30

By Desmond Brown

Mount Nevis sits at the centre of the volcanic island of Nevis, which has reserves of geothermal energy. Nevis is the smaller island of the pair, known as the Federation of St. Kitts and Nevis. Credit: Desmond Brown/IPS

Mount Nevis sits at the centre of the volcanic island of Nevis, which has reserves of geothermal energy. Nevis is the smaller island of the pair, known as the Federation of St. Kitts and Nevis. Credit: Desmond Brown/IPS

CHARLESTOWN, St. Kitts and Nevis, Jan 25 2016 (IPS) - Legislators on the tiny volcanic island of Nevis in the northern region of the Lesser Antilles say they are on a path to going completely green and have now set a date when they will replace diesel-fired electrical generation with 100 per cent renewable energy.

The island, with a population of 12,000 currently imports 4.2 million gallons of diesel fuel annually, at a cost of 12 million dollars, a bill it hopes to cut down significantly. Nevis consumes a maximum of 10 mw of energy annually.

Read more...
 
Tackling Climate Change in the Caribbean: Natural Solutions to a Human Induced Problem PDF Print E-mail
Earth News
Posted by Joan Russow   
Monday, 15 February 2016 11:15

By Jessica Faietal

Jessica Faieta is United Nations Assistant Secretary General and UNDP Regional Director for Latin America and the Caribbean | @JessicaFaieta @UNDPLAC

SANCHEZ, Petite Martinique. Climate-proofing the tiny island of Petite Martinique includes a sea revetment 140 metres long to protect critical coastal infrastructure from erosion. Credit: Tecla Fontenad/IPS

SANCHEZ, Petite Martinique. Climate-proofing the tiny island of Petite Martinique includes a sea revetment 140 metres long to protect critical coastal infrastructure from erosion. Credit: Tecla Fontenad/IPS

UNITED NATIONS, Feb 2 2016 (IPS) - The world is still celebrating the Paris Agreement on Climate Change, the main outcome of the 21st Conference of the Parties of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Its ambitions are unprecedented: not only has the world committed to limit the increase of temperature to “well below 2°C above pre-industrial levels,” it has also agreed to pursue efforts to “limit the temperature increase to 1.5 °C.”

Read more...
 
Floods Pose Challenge for South American Integration PDF Print E-mail
Earth News
Posted by Joan Russow   
Monday, 15 February 2016 11:08

By Fabiana Frayssinet

In Uruguay 22,414 people have been displaced by the floods that have affected the countries of the Mercosur trade bloc. Credit: Sistema Nacional de Emergencias (Sinae)

In Uruguay 22,414 people have been displaced by the floods that have affected the countries of the Mercosur trade bloc. Credit: Sistema Nacional de Emergencias (Sinae)

BUENOS AIRES, Jan 4 2016 (IPS) - The flooding that has affected four South American countries has underscored the need for an integrated approach to addressing the causes and effects of climate change.

Above and beyond joint emergency response plans, global warming poses common problems like deforestation and the management of shared rivers.

Some 180,000 people have been evacuated since the worst flooding in years hit the region over the year-end holidays.

Read more...
 
IAEA from 1992 – 2016: SYSTEMIC CONSTRAINT; - A REGULATOR MUST NOT A PROMOTER BE. PDF Print E-mail
Earth News
Posted by Joan Russow   
Friday, 05 February 2016 13:37

IAEA from 1992 – 2016S: SYSTEMIC CONSTRAINT; - A REGULATOR MUST NOT A PROMOTER BE.

At cop21, The IAEA was continuing the promotion of Nuclear energy:

 

 Nuclear power can make a "significant contribution" to combatting climate change - "one of the most important environmental challenges facing the world today" - while providing energy for economic growth, according to the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA).

The IAEA yesterday announced the publication of its report entitled Climate Change and Nuclear Power 2015. The annual publication, it says, "provides a comprehensive review of the potential role of nuclear power in mitigating global climate change and its contribution to other economic, energy and environmental challengers." The report also looks at the economics of nuclear energy, safety, waste management and non-proliferation.

 

NUCLEAR ENERGY IS NOT THE SOLUTION TO CLIMATE CHANGE

 

 

 IN 1992  I attended, on behalf of the Whistler Foundation For a Sustainable Environment,the United Nations Conference on Climate Change and distributed an Statement prepared by”Dr Fred Knelman, Vice President of the Whistler Foundation For a Sustainable Environment; and Dr David Krieger, President of the Nuclear Age Peace Foundation.

 

Nobel Laureate Statement to UNCED 92

In the statement which was signed by the following Nobel Laureates;  was the  Call

 

·        to establish a time –table for phasing our fossil fuel and nuclear energy and for the rapid development of solar and other forms of non-polluting energy, and for more efficient energy use;

 

Signed: Gerd Binnig, The XI  Dalai Lama, Leo Esaki, Val L. Fitch, Herbert A. Hauptman, Dudley Herschbach, GerhardHerzberg, David H. Hubel, Jerome Karle, Gregory S. Kavka, Klaus von Klitzing, Leon M. Lederman, Yuan T. Lee, Wassily Leontief,  Bernard Lown, Mairead Corrigan Maguire, Barbara McClintock, J.E. Meade, Sinon van der Meer, Bruce Merrifield, Marshall W. Nirenberg, Linus Pauling, John Polanyi, Carlo Rubbia, Abdus Salam, Claude Simon, Herbert A. Simon, George D. Snell, Roger W. Sperry, Henry Taube, Jan Tinbergen, Archbishop Desmond Tutu, George Wald, Elie Wiesel, Robert W. Wilson.l

Hans Blix, the thenSecretary General of IAEA, made a presentation, to the UNGA plenary, at UNCED exclaiming that `nuclear Energy is the solution  to climate change. At the final plenary, boxes and boxes of IAEA nuclear promotion pamphlets were dropped off at the lobby in front of the general Assembly.  They were piled up on a table and I covered each pile with piles of  Statements by the Nobel Laureates.

SYSTEMIC CONSTRAINT; - A REGULATOR MUST NOT A PROMOTER BE.

When I returned to Canada ,  I worked with Dr Fred Knelman on extracting systemic constraints from the IAEA Pamphlets.

IAEA SEDUCTIVE DEVICES, DOCTRINES, DOGMAS, STRATEGIES AND FALLACIESARE FUNDAMENTAL SYSTEMIC CONSTRAINTS PREVENTINGTHE NECESSARY SOCIALECOLOGICAL   CHANGE:

By Joan Russow  and Fred Knelman, June 1992

 

iThe "blatant misrepresentation or expedient omission" device

 

This device involves the convenient exclusion of any part that could be detrimental to one's position.

            The IAEA through expedient omission (possibly for advantageous "clarification") has left out a significant section in Agenda 21 which does not include nuclear energy in the list of "safe" technologies for the future.

To "clarify" Agenda 21, the IAEA in its UNCED document stated the following:

 

The UNCED Agenda 21 notes the need for a transition to environmentally sound energy systems, which will entail major changes in the patterns of energy production and consumption (IAEA Document, p.5, 1992)

 

In the Atmosphere chapter of Agenda 21, the following [safe] and sound technologies are advocated:

 

cooperate to increase the availability of capacity, capabilities and relevant technologies ...for utilizing and producing environmentally [safe and} sound renewable energy resources, such as solar, wind, geothermal, hydropower and biomass,... Each resource should be utilized in a manner that ... minimizes environmental stress and health impacts, .... (Section 9. Subsection 9 g Agenda 21, 1992)

 

             Thus, we see that in the Energy section of Agenda 21, Nuclear energy is not mentioned as being one of the [safe] or sound technology.

 

ii The "coopted terms" strategy

 

This strategy involves the stipulating of a new definition for a term that would jeopardize one's own argument.

 

In the Rio Declaration the following precautionary principle was advocated:

 

 Where there are threats of serious or irreversible damage, lack of full scientific certainty shall not be used as a reason for postponing cost-effective measures to prevent environmental degradation." ( Rio Declaration, 1992).

 

 

In the following statement, the IAEA redefines the important precautionary principle that was agreed to in the Rio Declaration, 1992.

 

The basic principles for radiation protection and safety in all applications and activities in nuclear science and technology are precautionary (IAEA Document , p. 2, authors emphasis)

 

The Rio principle, however, if enacted and truly adhered to, would bring about a moratorium on new nuclear power plants while phasing out currently existing ones.

 

iii The "comparison of convenience" device

 

This device involves the narrowing down of alternatives so that whatever aspect is compared will appear favourable to the proposed alternative.

 

In the following statement from the IAEA document, the IAEA narrows the alternatives used for comparison to those which would appear to be favourable within the terms of reference of their comparison. Thus, for example, they compare the relatively low volume of nuclear wastes to the much larger volume of wastes from fossil fuels. However, it is the volume of wastes multiplied by their toxicity that is significant. Merely comparing volumes is a "comparison of convenience". The same false comparison is used to compare fuel requirements for the same energy output.

 

 A nuclear plant would require 27 tonnes of slightly enriched uranium each year, which corresponds to a few truckloads. The corresponding quantity of natural uranium is 160 tonnes.

a coal fired plant would need 2.6 million tonnes of coal each year... which corresponds to the load carried by 5 trains, each transporting 1400 tones every day

an oil fired plant would require 2 million tonnes of fuel oil per year, which is about 10 supertanker loads. (IAEA document, 1992, p.12)

 

The nuclear establishment never fails to compare coal and nuclear as competing energy sources, always claiming the inherent superiority of nuclear . Usually this is accomplished by failing to include the entire fuel cycle over its full life of impacts, social and environmental. They conveniently exclude "safety" factors," "production of wastes,". "disposability of wastes," "degree of potential for bioaccumulation," lifetimes of wastes, toxicity and proliferation problems associated with nuclear.

 

Yet no bombs are built of coal, no terrorist is interested in hijacking coal or in the clandestine acquisition of coal weapons, coal plants do not have to be decommissioned and mothballed after some 30 to 50 years of operation, their hazardous wastes do not have to be guarded for 100,000 years, coal dust is easier to contain than radon and coal plants do not require liability subsidies by acts of parliament" ( Knelman, 1992)

 

 

iii The "lull and lure of the technological fix" syndrome

( the "misleading assurance" device or the fallacy of "technological omnipotence")

 

This syndrome, device or fallacy involves the revealing of the seriousness of the problem and the offering of a "solution" which is usually worse than the problem

The proponents of a potentially dangerous act indicate that they recognize the danger and focus on one area for which they can offer a technological fix

 

In the following statement from the Radioactive Wastes section of Agenda 21, into which it appears that the IAEA had input, the following situation is recognized:

 

Annually about 200,000 m3 of low-level and intermediate-level waste and 10,000 m3 of high-level waste ( as well as spent nuclear fuel destined for final disposal) is generated world wide from nuclear power production. These volumes are increasing as more nuclear power units are taken into operation, nuclear facilities are decommissioned and the use of radionuclides increases. The high level waste contains about 99 percent of the radionuclides and thus represents the largest radiological risk. ( Agenda 21, Radio Active wastes, 21.1.).

 

In the IAEA document the authors affirm the certainty of the technological fix.

 

There is nevertheless a consensus among experts that safe geological disposal of high level wastes, including spent nuclear fuel, is technically feasible. ( IAEA Document, p.17)

The view of experts in the field is that safe technological solutions exist for managing the waste. (IAEA Document, 1992, p. 15)

 

Knelman (1992) pointed out that

 

The assumption behind the notion of permanent disposal of High level wastes deep in a stable geological formation is false because this assumption relies on the mistaken belief that anything we do technologically can be permanent This assumption of permanence is particularly false when we are dealing with the lithosphere over some 100,000 years and when we must first disturb the geological structure by digging a very deep hole. AECL(Atomic Energy of Canada Limited) has dug a deep hole near Lac du Bonnet in Manitoba which is totally inappropriate for such so-called "permanent" disposal. For one thing you must, in all events, avoid water. Yet, The AECL hole must be soaked Walt Patterson, a nuclear critic described this AECL research as follows: A drunk has lost his keys and is discovered by a police officer crawling around a street light. When questioned, the drunk admitted that he had lost his keys in front of a dark building, a block away. When asked why the drunk was then searching around the street light, the drunk said " you see, officer, the light is better here" and as Dr. Martin Resnikoff, an expert on geological waste disposal has put it " the earth does not stand still. In other words, experts in the relevant fields do not agree. (Knelman, 1992, in progress)

 

iv The "rhetoric of notwithstanding clause" doctrine.

 

This doctrine allows for the indulging in strong statements about deep concern and the need for significant change and then including a notwithstanding clause that negates the strong statement.

 

In the Rio declaration (1992) there is a strong statement about third world dumping:

 

States should effectively cooperate to discourage or prevent the relocation and transfer to other States of any activities and substances that cause sever environmental degradation or are found to be harmful to human health. (Principle 14 Rio Declaration, 1992)

(

There are, however, disturbing "notwithstanding clauses" that appear such as in the following statements:

 

Develop regulatory and non-regulatory measures and procedures aimed at preventing the export of chemicals that are banned, severely restricted, withdrawn or not approved for health or environmental reasons, except when such export has received prior written consent from he importing country or is other wise in accordance with the PIC procedure; ( Section 19. subsection 53 f , Agenda 21, 1992)

 

In the following statement in the IAEA document, the IAEA energetically adopts the spirit of the " rhetoric of notwithstanding clauses"

 

The IAEA in 1990 promulgated a Code of Practice on the International Transboundary Movement of Radioactive Waste as a basis for harmonization of national legislation and policies. The code lays down the conditions and principles for international waste transfers, such as that movement must be made in a manner consistent with the international safety standards, that there must be prior notification and consent of the sending, receiving and transit States, and that each State involved should have a regulatory authority...( IAEA Document, 1992, p. 20

 

v. The "flamboyant absurdity" doctrine or dogma

 

This doctrine or dogma carries the concerns of one's opponents to the point where the regulations governing the opponents concerns should become the standard by which other potentially lesser concerns will be addressed.

           

The IAEA appears to advocate that, what is considered to be the most dangerous industry, just because it is dangerous, has developed stringent standards, and that they who contribute to possibly the greatest uncontrollable hazard are the ones who should assist the community in dealing with other hazards.

 

The basic principles for radiation protection and safety in all applications and activities in nuclear science and technology are precautionary and are so well founded in science and so widely accepted that they are now also being regarded as a source of guidance in controlling pollutants and impacts arising from other human activities. Their wider application would undoubtedly contribute towards sustainable development. (p.2)

 

vi. The "justification through dire consequences of alternatives" device

 

This device involves the revealing of the dire consequences of the current practices and offering one own practice as the salvation for the problem

           

In the following statement the IAEA cites the dire consequences of the other alternatives to justify their proposed alternative:

 

The problem of acid rain, which is linked to emissions from the burning of fossil fuels, has been recognized for decades..... . the primary concern about the continued and increasing use of fossil fuels is the problem of CO2 emission and the potential impact on world climate....... World conference on the Changing Atmosphere... need to reduce CO2 emission (IAEA document, p. 5)

climate change in connection with fossil fuels (p. 9)

 

vii. The "benevolent outcome exploitation" strategy

           

This strategy involves the selection of the outcome which the opposition to the proposed alternative would advocate and the subsequent attempt to demonstrate that the proposed alternative, which the opposition would condemn, would

be the best way of achieving that outcome.

           

In the following statements from the IAEA document, the IAEA focuses on the desired outcomes of reducing acid rain and limiting greenhouse gas to justify the selection of their proposed alternative:

 

Several governments have already made commitments to reduce carbon emission, while recognizing that this will be hard to achieve except through drastic policy decisions in the energy sector. (IAEA Document, 1992, p.6)

 

Nuclear power plants in normal operations cause very little environmental detriment and are beneficial when they replace plants which would emit CO2, SO2, and NO2 (p. 12). In this respect they would help to reduce acid rain and limit greenhouse gas emissions (IAEA Document 1992 , p. 12)

 

To accomplish the above, IAEA and other nuclear proponents are recommending the construction of some 4000 to 5000 new commercial nuclear power plants. The combination of the multi- trillion cost and the time required for construction renders this proposal no less than bewildering. By the 6 to 10 year period required for construction, other sources of climate-altering gases would wipe out all gains. Secondly at 1/7th to 1/10th the above cost, a much greater reduction in CO 2 and other climate-altering gases can be achieved through simple available conservation and efficiency measures.

 

viii. The "shelter of fragmentation" syndrome

This syndrome involves the dissociating of the problem from a more generic problem by placing the problem in its own isolated category.

 

In the agenda 21 document, Nuclear wastes are not included in the section of hazardous wastes because atomic wastes has its own section. Nuclear wastes thus seem to appear apart from hazardous wastes and from the strong recommendation associated with hazardous wastes such as:

 

Governments should intensify research and development activities on cost-effective alternatives for processes and substances that currently result in the generation of hazardous wastes that pose particular problems for environmentally sound disposal or treatment, the possibility of ultimate phase-out of those substances that present and unreasonable or otherwise unmanageable risk and are toxic, persistent and bio-accumulative to be considered as soon as practicable. Section 20 subsection 13c, Agenda 21, 1992)

 

ix. The "flaunting and condoning of the vicious circle principle" strategy

 

This strategy is best explained by the economic principle that "bad money drives out good,". that is the opportunity costs of nuclear power are unacceptable and prohibitive Thus the money spent to subsidize nuclear power is at the expense of the funds required to solve the energy problem with safe alternatives, and consequently, because the research into alternatives will not be effectively carried out, the safe alternatives will not be able to adequately replace the non-renewable forms of energy.

 

In the 1992 report to UNCED, following was stated:

Nuclear energy has safety risks associated with the entire uranium cycle, from mining through processing to the ultimate disposal of high-level radioactive wastes. In addition, there are safety risks associated with the reactors used to generate electricity from uranium . And the use of fossil fuel to drive conventional thermal generation produces carbon dioxide and waste heat. (Canada's National report UNCED p. 46- 47)

From a domestic consumption point of view, the least environmentally damaging energy option is energy efficiency. (Canada's National report UNCED p. 47)

 

Despite the above statement, the document concludes::

 

New, cleaner technologies such as solar energy may help, but the hard fact is that to a large extent we will have to rely on either thermal, hydro, or nuclear energy in the future. In addition, energy projects for both export and domestic supply provide jobs and economic wealth to the country, and are especially important in some regions of Canada" ( p. 47. Canada's National report UNCED June, 1992, authors' emphasis)

 

 

CONCLUSION:

The " nukespeak" and the seductive devices, strategies, syndromes used by the Nuclear Industry involve the language of delusion and distortion. Hopefully, through the continued revealing and categorizing of these words of delusion we could, in some small way, counteract the impact of the not too-hidden-agenda of the IAEA, and the rest of the nuclear establishment and their government supporters.

 

REFERENCES:

Agenda 21, (1992) UNCED document,

 

Hilgartner S. Richard C. Bell, R. O'Connor 1982 Nukespeak the Selling of     Nuclear Technology in America. Markam Ontario, Penquin Books        Ltd.

IAEA ( 1992) Nuclear Power, Nuclear Techniques and Sustainable   Development. Vienna, Austria: IAEA

Knelman, F. ( 1976) Nuclear Energy the Unforgiving Technology.

             Edmonton: Hurtsig Publishers

Knelman , F(. 1986) " Beyond 1984: The Future of Peace". in Arnopoulos

            (ed). Prospects for Peace: An Anthology of Canadian Perspectives           on Social Conflict and Peaceful Change. Montreal: Gamma    Institute Press.

Knelman, F. (1992, in progress) Nuclear Power: the Conspiracy of the Like-minded.

Patterson, W. (1992) " In search of the peaceful atom" Energy Policy,        June 1986, pp 196-200

Rio Declaration (1992) UNCED document

Russow, J and White,D ((1991) Systemic Constraints Preventing Change.

introduced at the Learned Societies Congress, Kingston

Russow, J (1992). Content Analysis of the UNCED documents that were     adopted by Global Consensus: Agenda 21 and the Rio  Declaration.

Russow, J. (1992). "Seductive Devices and Strategies in , IAEA document that was prepared for UNCED" paper presented "Nuclear Issues          and Rio," public lecture sponsored by the Greater Victoria Disarmament Group 

and the Vancouver Island Peace Society

Last Updated on Saturday, 20 February 2016 23:10
 
COP21: A LACK OF GLOBAL VISION AND FULL OF SYSTEMIC CONSTRAINTS PDF Print E-mail
Earth News
Posted by Joan Russow   
Saturday, 30 January 2016 13:15

ALSO IN ANNEX SUBMISSION TO THE CLIMATE CHANGE PLAN FOR BRITISH COLUMBIA

 

by Joan Russow, Global Compliance Research Project

 

 

Image result for IMAGES OF ACTIVISM AT COP21
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The Secretary General, Ban Ki-Moon,urged the states to negotiate with a global vsion, not a with a specific national vision

 

  In the COP21 Preamble was the following:

 

“climate change represents an urgent and potentially irreversible threat to human society and the planet”

yet was there ‘a global vision and was the urgency addressed in COP 21

 

There were systemic constraints preventing the global urgency of climate change:

1. The two degree fallacy - "At 2 degrees the poor the disenfranchised and the vulnerable would not survive, at 1.5, they might" (COP15, IPCC PRESS CONFERENCE)

2.   Some states are more equal than others, and that the forests that are left are to offset our emissions

Last Updated on Tuesday, 12 December 2017 07:12
Read more...
 
<< Start < Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next > End >>

Latest News